THE WORLD OF TOKENIZED ASSETSEDITION UNDER REVIEW 15 REAL
LINK TO TOKENEnter the tokenized world.⌕
Home/How we review the data
LINK TO TOKEN

How we review the data

The source of each fact matters

Four clear statuses

Verified: a specific fact cross-checked against an identified independent source. Published by the issuer: information attributed to its documentation, without independent validation. Unverified: insufficient evidence or checks pending. Demo: fictional information that does not describe a real offer.

Field-level verification

Status applies to each claim, not the entire project. Every field can include a source, access date, reviewer and notes. Verifying an entity’s identity does not verify its solvency, assets or token security.

Radar Link to Token

Radar covers ten areas: available information, issuer identity, audits, legal documents, smart contract, blockchain, liquidity, track record, updates and custody. Real profiles include the scope and source of each status where available. Fictional examples retain illustrative indicators. No investment score is calculated and projects are not ranked by financial appeal.

Updates and corrections

Future real-project profiles must retain access dates and a change history. If a source becomes unavailable or a claim cannot be confirmed, its status must be reviewed. Discrepancies will be shown without hiding limitations in the evidence.

Comparisons and statistics

Aggregated data must state its date, currency, coverage, source and rules against double counting. Demo amounts are not added to real market figures. Country and blockchain pages organise the catalogue without implying regulatory approval.

Editorial policy

Buy or sell signals and good or bad investment labels are not allowed. Future commercial partnerships must be identified and kept separate from verification. Demo pages will not be indexed as real information.